 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Scope
The scope of the underlying deductive quanta numbers scheme is built from purely dynamic vacuum & perfect plasma quanta pairs up to three types of mechanical atomic nucleus quanta; the latter ones may be interpreted as atomic nuclei of three atom types of anorganic chemistry, conductor, semi-conductor, and non-conductor atoms.
Opportunities
The Unified Field Theory includes a
- 2-component dynamic "Perfect Plasma" Maxwell-Mie Theory (PMT)
- 2-component mechanical "Electromagnetics" Maxwell-Mie Theory (EMT)
- 1-component mechanical "Dirac 2.0 Atomic Nucleus" Theory (ANT)
- 1-component Dynamic Fluid Theory (DFT).
It enables
- a well-posed
3D-NSE system enabled by dynamic fluid particles by the DFT
- a Yang-Mills SU(2)-invariance for atomic particles by the ANT
- a Schrödinger 2.0 operator enabled by the Riesz operator.
The UFT solves the baseline "self-energy problem" of an electron, avoiding the spin and the iso-spin hypotheses, (UnA6) p. 100. It provides an appropriate modelling framework explaining the decay of a neutron into an electron and a proton (as part of the PMT). It also "explains" why a magneton meeting an electroton "decays" into "pure energy" (as part of EMT), (UnA6) p. 102.
Regarding ANT the term "Dirac 2.0 Atomic Nucleus" is chosen in reference to the term "Mach 2.0" principle, which is essentially the Mach principle + Dirac's two large number hypotheses, (UnA1) p. 156.
The PMT may be interpreted as an Einstein-Lorentz ether, (EiA5). It "explains" the Landau damping phenomenon. The combination with the EMT might provide an alternative "explanation" of the CMBR phenomenon.
The EMT "explains" the so-called "photopheresis" phenomenon discovered by F. Ehrenhaft, (BrJ).
The borderlines between the 2-component, purely
dynamic worlds and the 1-component mechanical worlds may be characterized
by appropriate „Nature constants“.
The borderline between the PMT and the ANT may
be evaluated in connection with Robitaille’s „blackbody radiation and
the loss of universality:
implications for Planck’s formulation and Boltzman’s constant“, (RoP3).
The borderline between PMT and ANT also puts the spot on
the several different "plasma matter" types and the related different plasma theories
("hot", "medium", "cold", "solid").
The Maxwell-Mie equations framework "explains", why the field possesses a
granular structure, while the knots of energy remain intact in spite of the
back-and-forth flux of energy and momentum, (WeH) p. 171.
In line with the Mie
theory Einstein’s theory can be derived from Hilbert’s gravitational (matter)
Lagrangian accompanied by an appropriately defined „total action“ term, (PeR4) p. 490.
All
known tests of the GRT can be explained with the concept of a variable speed of
light, (DeH), (UnA1) p. 142. Additionally, there is a „nonlinear stability
of the Minkowski space“, (ChD). Approximation theory of a nonlinear operator equation in
Hilbert scales is enabled by an appropriate decomposition of the nonlinear operator N=L+R into a lineralized operator L and a remaining nonlinear operator R. In this context "nonlinear energy stability" is ensured if the nonlinear variational equation representation fulfills the
Garding inequality with respect to the underlying „energy norm“ induced by the
linearized term L. In this case the remaining nonlinear operator R may be interpreted as compact
disturbance of the linear operator, (BrK0) p. 11, (BrK13).
Einstein's famous formula E = m*c*c may be interpreted as approximation formula, where the energy terms on both sides of the equation are interpreted as norms of the underlying weak variational representation in a less granular energy Hilbert space framework.
 Braun K., The deductive structure of the UFT, creative vacuum and perfect plasma, and related opportunities.pdf |
June 18, 2025 update: pp. 9/11
Braun, K., An unified field theory enabling a deductive structure of physics.pdf |
 Braun, K., An unified field theory enabling a deductive structure of physics.docx |
December 2022
